The UK imports hordes of rapefugee muslims and suffered terrorism etc.
Japan heavily restricts muslim immigration to about 20 people per year.
Which system works better?
Muslim terrorists are devout.
The ones who drink alcohol and eat bacon and don’t believe in throwing homosexuals from tall buildings and treating women as tent wearing second class citizens are not devout and, quite frankly, aren’t really muslims. MINO (muslims in name only, if you will).
So how do we solve the devout muslim terrorist problem?
– ending all welfare for all immigrants
– mandatory language, assimilation and attainment checks for legal immigrants
– committing a crime = deportation + lifetime ban
– ending all favoritism of Islam and revoking all special exemptions
– restoring borders with physical barriers and armed guards authorized to shoot
– any attempt to enter or stay in the country illegally = deportation + lifetime ban
– aiding and abetting illegal immigration = life imprisonment
– organizing, inciting or carrying out terrorism = death sentence
– not reporting terrorists = life imprisonment
– citizenship revocable for extreme offenses
Implement these common-sense measures (that we’ve been using as little as 50 years ago) and our problem will be solved within one generation.
If you want more proof of how easy this issue actually would be to solve, just consider how much effort the elites have put into causing problems during the last few decades. It took them trillions in money, immense manpower, staggering corruption, overwhelming worldwide propaganda and multiple major wars, yet we’re still at a point where nothing is irreversible yet and where all where of their machinations could be reversed within several years – if only some willpower were regained by our lethargic societies.
Essentially we would have first to defeat the globalists, then tackle the problem of Islam. This would be done by supporting the secularists and Islamic reformers. Yes – I would prefer a total disappearance of Islam, but that might happen anyway over time.
+ As a measure we start treating Islam like they treat Christianity – no new mosques, no missionary movements, no public prayers – almost all Muslim countries have those rules in place and we do the same.
+ of course stop all aggressive wars against Muslim states
+ stop Muslim immigration to West full stop – Ex-Muslims and non-Muslim Middle Easterners can come. We will test their faith with an extended Roosh’s airport test that he proposed in one article.
+ start teaching about Islam in detail in school, universities, TV programs – done by scholars, Ex-Muslims Ex-Salafis, dissecting the entire religion word for word, true brutal history, Quran told up and down from early peaceful verses to violent last 13 years and abrogation taugh, Hadiths told – all the gore and blood and guts
+ crack down super-hard on all Islamists – all the ones on the watchlist – I would have a special solution for them. Those that cannot be deported would be in a relatively luxurious detainment center with lots of green spaces, books, TV and internet. They get social security anyway – not having to spy on them and paying for their brats is good enough for me.
+ Deport everyone possible
+ Offer all known more devout Muslims the option of receiving 20.000$/50.000$/100.000$ in a lump sum for the giving up of citizenship and going back the ancestral homeland. Help them get citizenship back.
+ support secular Islamic leaders like Assad full throttle – he would be given 200.000 troops on the ground if necessary
+ of course defeat radical groups like ISIS instantly – move in 500.000 soldiers with tanks, artillery, airforce if necessary – crush them with overwhelming firepower, be ruthless against all terrorists – death by boiling in pig fat
+ support secular leaders and Islamic reformers with hundreds of billions of dollars, even military aid
+ over time topple all Islamic republics and help hoist ethical strongmen onto power (finding ethical ones is not that difficult, but the globalists don’t test for ethics – I would and trust me, it is not that difficult – the globalists don’t test for it, because most of them are psychopaths anyway and dealing with other psychos serves them better)
This would likely result in:
+ slight increase of terror in short-term, but tremendous decrease of terror in the long-term, also those that would stay in the West would behave
+ massive secularization of Muslims in West and in home countries
+ huge increase of Ex-Muslims – people leaving that shitty cult like no tomorrow (you would also have full teaching of Islam also on all Muslim channels – that is super-easy to control – many Muslims would find out how wonderful Mohammed truly was)
+ rise in IQs due to decrease of inbreeding in Muslim countries
+ rise in IQs due to pregnant women not fasting during Ramadan and getting high-quality prenatal care and supplements
Taken from a post from the RooshV forum
President Donald Trumps pick for education Sec was confined yesterday with vice president Mike Pence using his vote to secure the nomination. Thats how their system works in America.
But who is Betsy DeVos, and , rather more importantly what does she believe in and what changes will she try to make.
From doing some research it seems that Betsy DeVos wants state schools to be replaced with private schools funded by taxpayer vouchers and then possibly wants to remove taxpayers money from education.
Seems reasonable to me.
After all, the ONLY way to drive up results and drive down costs is by competition and the steps above certainly help competition so this will work.
A problem could be that because she is more religious than the average that she will focus on including supreme being religious stuff in the curriculum but I don’t expect this to be much of a problem.
Let me explain why. For most lessons it won’t matter, i.e. English, Maths , Physics etc. You simply can’t shoehorn religion into those subjects, a gerund will continue to be a gerund, algebra will still be provable and Newtonian and Einsteinium physics will still operate as they do now.
For Geography and Religious Education this does present a problem. However most children go through 11 years of state indoctrination and most do not turn into foaming lefties. The same will happen with teaching supreme being religious indoctrination.
So, the end result will be better education of children because of the increased competition and better educated children will be better able to reject attempts to brainwash them.
Imagine a class of well educated children openly laughing when the teacher tries to include something about the successes of socialism or visions from a supreme being.
There is no comeback from being derided.
A lot of libertarians make the mistake of that because a change isn’t perfect according to our beliefs we should reject it. I used to be like that myself.
DeVos is certainly not perfect but is a step in the right direction.
Religion was important in olden times, it gave a structure to society and gave the elite a power base from which to govern yet it would not have prospered unless ordinary people also benefitted in some way.
I am not saying that religion gave people something to believe in or the chance of a better life in the hereafter but that it was useful as a guide to life, i.e. don’t borrow or lend money, form a mutual pair bond, treat other people as they treat you etc.
Until the start of the industrial revolution (hooray for capitalism) ordinary people had it hard. Staying alive was a struggle, lack of food and no education meant people needed all the help they could get. Religion supplied that help.
We can see a modern day counterpart in the opposite of religion in the welfare state. Nowadays the thick are looked after from the cradle to the grave and no longer get the social reinforcement that would better direct them to lead purposeful lives and be happier.
Take a walk around your local “sink” estate, council house slums, living of the taxpayer and crime, full of depravity, the lack of morality is palpable.
Yet religion is falling. People no longer believe in supreme beings, messengers from god, virgin births etc.
How do we as a society keep the useful bits that ordinary people can use to help themselves whist doing away with the supreme being stuff?
One way is to use honest conversation, a perfect example is Stefan Molyneaux at Freedman Radio (FDR).
To quote Infogalactic:- In 2005, Molyneux began a podcast called Freedomain Radio (FDR). He uses the same name for the website on which he distributes his own writings, hosts podcast archives, and provides an Internet forum for FDR listeners. Molyneux also produces videos and commentary on current events, and he presents a weekly call-in show on which listeners can ask questions or discuss personal issues.
There is a clear public appetite for honest conversation Freedman Radio got well over 100 million downloads in 2016 alone. Mr Molyneauxs books which are all available as free downloads would all dominate the best seller lists. And this is all done by voluntary donations, there is no advertising.
So, if you are curious about the big questions, need help with philosophical problems or just need good old fashioned honest conversation head over to Freedomain Radio.